Decommissioning and nuclear matter and Asahi editorial rework editorial in Asahi Shimbun and Sankei Shimbun that head-on confrontation or not should from economic and social theory Tsuga nuclear power plant unit 2 seek decommissioning in.
Asahi Shimbun is like waste furnace concluded nuclear regulatory Commission that they have picked up and corrupting the energy problem for Japan into confusion.
I don't think this is an anti-Japanese neighbours just aim at the decline of Japan wished Asahi raising companies, assisting in it. Asahi newspaper editorial (5 / 17 / 2013) nuclear-free and local-model case for the status quo Tsuruga pipe dream no longer concluded with active fault beneath the Tsuruga nuclear power plant unit 2 was born from the lessons of the Fukushima nuclear regulatory Commission experts meeting in Tsuruga-Shi, Fukui.
One Committee was "so far without incident fortunately came over to say it" and has said.
Rack your brain at various boost you can get rid of Tsuruga is "nuclear Ginza" the time has come.
To ridicule the "nuclear Ginza" Tsuruga said.
Asahi Shimbun is committed to decommissioning, nuclear stopping while using voice readers a one-sided, concentrated campaign to.
(Editorial) model (5 / 17) to escape nuclear power plant and the Tsuruga local
First recognize primary sorting, full-scale Tsuruga unit 2 active, assertive rework (5 / 16)
"Elementary particles"--aim for monju disposal decommissioning 5/18 (voice) (5 / 18) (5 / 15) monju disposal--again reopening contrast there cannot be (5 / 14), Sankei newspaper on the same day without waiting for why carriers Japan original electric survey results to jump to conclusions of decommissioning and questioned.
Listen to and certainly problematic to the personnel Committee.
Eliminate all scholars conducted a survey during construction and question mark during the current Commission with experts there said.
Sankei reorganized mission to argue and make fair and scientific judgment, can convince the company. What a 待 situ thermocouple survey why [claim] Tsuruga fault Sankei Shimbun (ditto)? this is based on scientific judgment. It's no wonder certified.
The description of the zone nuclear regulatory Commission expert mission driving beneath the Japan nuclear Tsuruga nuclear power plant, Fukui Prefecture No. 2 machine for impression.
Report a fault should consider this fracture zone on the seismic design of nuclear power plants concluded that potentially affecting the recognized and that, near the 浦底 fault activities, at the same time moving above an important facility. But not convinced Japan original electric Regulatory Commission report. Company has a detailed geological survey site, based on the problems of aquifer is 120000-130000 years ago has countered with no association with the 浦底 fault, instead of the fault moved in later. Japan original den is conducting additional research before the end of June to substantiate the claim. Seeking hope waiting report summary until a result is obtained, Regulatory Affairs Committee is a shaped unilaterally closed the discussion. This truncation should not. Regulatory Affairs Committee shortened the schedule's first meeting last December, suggests the judgement "most likely fault". This would be the attitude of the scientific controversies?
Reviewing heard enough opinions against each other, deeper understanding, approaching the correct recognition of the muscle. Regulatory Commission so why rush conclusions?
Japan original electro additional investigation and isn't afraid of regulations subject to the inconvenient evidence emerges even it is reluctant.
Report by expert investigators urge Tanaka Shunichi, Chairman, a cautious response is likely raised a Regulatory Affairs Committee meetings over the next week. Through the Mission's voice finds mismatch between biased members chosen specialty and major research is not in up?
Tanaka Chairman invited experts who fault zone, to should a reorganization to performing their mission. 'D dumped nuclear irregularity exclusion bigotry is that case.
For unbiased scientific evaluation can convince the company in.
Anyway, accept the report could leave the root of evil judgement of the true safety of nuclear power plants.
Get pie see decommissioning the dominoes primary indispensable to Japan's economic growth picture, House of cards abenomics growth strategies, such as in an inevitable.
Abe this situation with folded arms, looking, actively intervene, raise the political and industrial circles should think about the need for safe use of nuclear energy and constructive proposals and have a conclusion.
I want to secure Mr Abe.
Rework of the nuclear power plant as soon as possible is desirable.
"Runaway" permit from Sankei newspaper editorials (23 / 5 / 2013) [claims] Tsuruga nuclear power plant reports regulatory committee report Japan languished in such waste furnace Domino Regulatory Affairs Committee agreed that an expert mission was organized under the Commission put together last week.
Report that certified zone runs beneath the Tsuruga nuclear power plant, Fukui Prefecture Japan nuclear power plant unit 2 (crack formation) and active faults.
Install the reactor critical facilities by national standards on active faults is not permitted.
Hence the worst-case No.2 it is what decommissioning equipment forced and jeopardize our survival as corporate Japan original electro. "Blinding"isolated and smug"> potentially affecting the nearby 浦底 fault working the investigation team is in zone no. 2 under the fault had on at the same time moving above an important facility to.
In contrast, Japan situ thermocouple is fracture zone is 120000-130000 years ago countered with no association with the 浦底 fault, instead of the fault moved in later. Another cause was elected expert, is better. Because the flat exclusion, University Professor is involved in the geological survey of the past such as professionals with detailed knowledge not participating.
Besides, biased expert tectonic geomorphology. This bias is as pointed out as a problem from the experts themselves. Is not further cause isn't listening claims Japan original den.
Diverse debate is in hiding in a complex geological fault investigation essential.
Japan original electro hurried report of expert investigators without waiting for the result is conducting additional research before the end of June to indicate not a fault.
"Now is the time political leadership] Notwithstanding the situation arisen in its pioneer Regulatory Affairs Committee about singling out () domino effect of nuclear plant decommissioning likely started from there, no positive, concrete message towards the improvement of the situation is coming from lawmakers. Regulatory Affairs Committee in Sanjo Board independence is guaranteed by law. So, where (like) bystanders if the resource poor country of Japan's energy policy will fail.
Even with shale gas to generate electricity is power line of atomic force and without bloated trade deficit stops. It's clearly against the constitutional executive power belongs in the Cabinet. 3 Government Shinzo Abe to wants to clearly shows directions and challenges to overcome and standing while respecting the independence of the Regulatory Affairs Committee the long-term prospects.
Not just politics, industry too should be going as constructive recommendations about the need for safe use of nuclear energy.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Asahi newspaper don't want and think is click!
『村』政治
*******************************************************
