Yamaguchi election has miserably fallen nuclear candidate heading the newspaper but I completely is not the essence.
It is true that nuclear power plant not sound theme of most of the residents is an anti-nuclear power plant losing is not at all.
This story is obvious.
This point is as follows.
1. Usually in local elections in current Government Prime Minister, likely ruling party candidate other than win to begin with zero.
With no significant approval ratings drop, not big blunders that visibly under the regime of the current Prime Minister.
2. Election system than the anti-nuclear, Democratic candidates should clear, Kan and Mr. hosono enters local.
Democratic supporters of non-equivalent without appeal. Democratic allergies aren't unusual.
To begin with.
3. Significant decline in voter turnout is a problem than that. This terrific turnout's the 38 is the discrepancy between people's minds are actually Prime soil.
It is 68 percent. (2010) The last upper House election Yamaguchi constituency voter turnout was 61%.
91%.
Down approximately 20 percent or more.
Yamaguchi is gubernatorial ⇒ general election = > I think it is a State of election fatigue, it chose this time in various forms I dive this turnout is poor.
Does not like is almost no choice, actually considered Japan to turn to political reality, I don't want to think anything they dare and go to elections, such as.
You came is such a result outright.
Don't expect politics is "not expected to press.
Tokyo, radioactive materials descent that is factors that foster such cheat cheat time elapsed time is now, Tokyo is analyzing one month's deposition (煤じん drops, rain water etc.) using germanium semiconductor radionuclide analysis equipment.
Data acquisition and measurement location is Tokyo Metropolitan Institute Shinjuku town a hundred. Here, amount of fallout what per 1 square meter data for the Bq. Numbers, of course, immediately and health effects will be substantial.
Is not measured up there it number of cesium 134 and cesium 137 is a Bq/kg recent numerical number 2 figures.
I became curious about, tried to pick up the data, either of cesium-134 cesium-137 exceeded the 2.
Cesium-134 cesium 137 (Bq / m) 03 01, 2013 - 04 01, 2013 2013 / 02 / 01 - 2013 / 03 / 01 14 25 2012 / 04 / 02 - 2012 05 / 01 / 11 14 03 02, 2012 - 04 02, 2012 14 18 01 04, 2012 - 02 02, 2012 8.9 11
2011 / 07 / 01 - 2011 / 08 / 01 26 27 2011 / 06 / 01 - 2011 / 07 / 01 18 18 2011 / 05 / 07 - 2011 / 06 / 01 74 74 2011 / 04 / 01 - 2011 / 05 / 07 290 2802011 / 03 / 01 - 2011 / 04 / 01 8500 There is now a descent amount not often worth think, look at the number of 8100 this is do, falling is still much trace.
Last year spring season also falling and once the 1-digit level will drop in 2 digits.
I think wind in the early spring, wind and dry conditions that can affect is and number has risen in a row this year even 2 months.
Is overwhelming many drops for 2011 immediately after the accident, amount of cesium falling 2013 March last month, no doubt also of 6/2011 monthly drop in most growing things.
Unfortunately, still caesium descend on Tokyo.
It is caesium metropolitan in Tokyo.
I'm appending data after becoming this year's Aichi FYI.
Aichi continues deposition measurements in Nagoya and Toyohashi, Higashi-Mikawa region zones.
Is megabecquerel / km2, i.e. possible in same Tokyo.
Not detectable in Nagoya are one and a half years almost slightly exceeds the lower limit of detection is only two times. After the accident, 4/2011, 14.3 MBq / kg sq m of detected is a maximum of Nagoya.
Toyohashi radioactive materials have reached barely continues the detection of trace amounts of 4/2012 observation in start.
Rather cesium-134 is not detectable turned last month for the first time.
○ Higashi Mikawa branch, Toyohashi, Tomimoto town Aichi Environmental Research Center (detection limit) samples sampling, cesium -137 cesium-134 3/1/2013 ~ 4/1/2013 0.068 not detectable （ 0.051 2/1/2013-3/1/2013 0.48 0.23 1/4/2013-2/1/2013 0.32 0.20
○ Nagoya-Shi Kita-ku, Aichi Environmental Research Center (detection limit) samples sampling, cesium -137 cesium-134 3/1/2013 ~ 4/1/2013 not detected （ 0.037 not detectable （ 0.048 2/1/2013 ~ 3/1/2013 not detected （ 0.039 not detectable （ 0.047 1/4/2013 ~ 2/1/2013 not detected （ 0.042 not detectable （ 0.052
When looking at numbers, differ in the future, just in case of emergency descent and descent amounts of Toyohashi Tokyo 3 orders of magnitude, as well as determines the descent of the cesium, situation, remains no summer 2011 and Tokyo. Sense asked to evacuate to the West from Aichi Prefecture is also this current situation followed by radioactive fallout too, I think.
