6/2/2013 Documents the trial of the "people 's" incident free speech issue 48: Okinawa times military governance suite is found after 53 years. Ryukyu Government disallowed and publishing people's Party newspaper people along the U.S. Court Party asked for the cancellation. Became torn between the Ryukyu Government deployed painful allegations "in extrajudicial military instructions, enable", the Court under law and judgment, one ordered the cancellation of unauthorized publication, the Government lost the case. Higa Masayuki former officials who served as Government representative (79) == Naha city was "lost, of course. I want to applaud the courage of the judges was "and look back. Abe Takeshi Maeda, Yoshiaki's (86) was the plaintiff in the former people's Party officials found article at Naha city home. 10/1960 Complaint and brief 8/61 Court, appellate court said December's original containing the project.
Mostly unknown in court before returning location, very important document. At that time, Ryukyu Government U.S. nunorei by had publication permits.
Receiving an application for the BJP, sought U.S. approval "even permissible". But the U.S. military in letter: clear bent news prejudiced writing, disrupt the residents' such as unauthorized "recommendation".
Ryukyu Government also changed radically, tell the BJP "cannot be allowed by a letter". Higa in Ryukyu Government Legal Affairs Bureau at the time, fourth year. He accused government agents, called "problematic". "Any reason even free speech should adhere to.
They're sure to lose in the theory "and thought I was. One dilemma, in preparing all written.
"Ryukyu Government sources of assistance of the High Commissioner 's" "letter is even legally binding", assembled logical premise autonomy and present titular. Thought judges bearish, considering his "a chance that also.
But "letter statute is not" political "were advised not allow only one ordered isn't" ruling in judgment, one consideration without the law and ordered the publication of unauthorized revocation based on facts. "Win or not would be pleased. I thought we lost against the judge is great "" Higa.
Stood at the beginning of the protest at the himself became judge of the Ryukyu Government, U.S. forces took jurisdiction over the case. "What no human rights before returning the judge"their vending machines"that strong.
At tackle the mighty U.S. military and successful role in the defense of human rights "and said. Publishing permit system is innocent of U.S. military judge now is his book "Okinawa speech control refrain from" the history of results of story is m n. St. Paul's Professor Emeritus Hiroshi journalism studies people trial of 出版 許可 制 有名無実 化 今 裁判官 米軍 著書 「 沖縄 言論 統制 史 遠慮 」 「 人民 話 門奈 直 樹 立教 大 名誉 教授 （ ー 論 ） 」 事件 裁判 結果 、 廃止 後 。 was subsequently abolished.
Was the battle of Okinawa to win the freedom of speech and its maximum. Occupied at that time, judge of the Ryukyu Government stood up rulers Almighty U.S. that resolute (the decision). Japan is an independent country now, contrary to judge who refrain to the U.S. military, does not hold accountable even ROAR injunction litigation.
Without relying on the universal values of human rights, mutual industries present positive flows.
