Recently, "wipe the collective evacuation trial" of high decision came out.
For more information and refer to the following, while acknowledging effects of low levels of ionizing radiation, was incomprehensible decision admitting the Group evacuation. Judicial concern to health hazards-"wipe fringe group evacuation trial", high decision out-to begin with why "wipe fringe group evacuation trial" it had to end. Will not have it's access that public promptly wittingly large amounts of radiation emitted from the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power station country, also attributed to not permit appropriate shelter. If the country mandates evacuation of people in highly concentrated polluted areas mandates that did not also acknowledged rights of displaced residents of the area more than 1 milliSievert years, had new life and migration compensation if perhaps that Sue also would.
Also wanted to evacuate the vulnerable groups cannot have a lot of their compensation and assistance is a national responsibility.
For example more than half area of 0.75 microsieverts is located in/h greater than 1.3 mSv three standards for radiation control area, eating well is actually forbidden in Fukushima city, year 8 millisieverts （/h 1 USV ） above that 28 percent of urban.
Although Yahoo News Chernobyl nuclear power plant accident in not immediately after the accident but a migrant rights found 1 mSv or more area residents are annual doses.
But back to contaminated land decontamination, lowered the spatial dose 20 millisieverts, below were evacuated as residents allowed residents even but that's Japan policy. （ tomorrow urashima ） serious health hazards caused by Chernobyl, it's still going on. And yet Japan Government jury who dose higher than radioactive controlled area, trying to be exposed.
Not the same course in Fukushima and Chernobyl but no health hazard, just because there is nothing. Some know Chernobyl damaged Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant exploded one after another, when people took refuge early. However, most Japanese appeared in the mass media patronized scholars that "containment is strong," says to believe.
Radioactive substances emitted when I even nuclear power plant exploded, is of course understood that I wouldn't like the Chernobyl reactor was wrecked by massive release you to somehow. But the United States was evacuated within United States people 80 kilometres fukuichi from immediately. I went to Tokyo to early April from 3/2011 late, rarely seen foreigners found no to Tokyo.
In the SPEEDI information is communicated to the United States, the metropolitan area even dangerous I knew. Chose lean endemic to address it without making a selection that Japan Government finds "right to shelter" Chernobyl precedent and policy. If you had acknowledged "right to shelter", admit health damage caused by low-dose radiation exposure. When you admit such trial later become a disadvantage. Country judgment probably shirk is ahead.
If further admitted "1 milliSievert" rights of displaced relative to in densely populated Japan, huge compensation costs associated with the migration. Will further tell a lie when I got lied to conceal the lie. If wrong judgment at the beginning, or after beginning in favor of evasion of responsibility has been keep per lie for if non- It's a chain of lies and cover-ups.
Japan now seems the situation and not. Know the health hazards concern the Court also in Fukushima. Not but admit the mass evacuation of children.
I wonder if that that Court also can't go against national decisions. I was wondering that's best to evacuate to avoid exposure. I hope above all children to live and in a slightly more secure. However, didn't call Fukushima people displaced in this blog. Are elderly people continue living in highly concentrated polluted areas in Chernobyl.
Would shelter for them is a painful, not to criticize their choice. But not leaving or evacuating at the present discretion individuals eventually. But I think most people can evacuate the displaced already. Be mixed feelings and I think people who judge people I wanted to shelter cannot evacuate many reasons, as well as risk is small, on the other hand, live in the contaminated area and determined that, say what I don't know.
Reality of nuclear accidents is end up tearing the people this way.
