Wednesday, May 1, 2013

Nuclear withdrawal delay faced a national crisis

"Nuclear withdrawal of late, it is directly related to the national crisis" warned France national research institutes.
Risk increased due to personnel of the nuclear power industry is inevitable! "Considering unwilling to proceed to the area a series of skilled technicians retired, promising nuclear power that no young engineers put too much time to withdrawal from nuclear power or hesitate to withdraw itself can be extremely dangerous for the future of the nation.
"France national nuclear safety Institute released this way.
You must save the national crisis concerning this article and discussed on Facebook with the Atomic Energy Commission Deputy Chair (or less) [I] in the decision!
National choice isn't going to waste furnace soon!
What Atomic Energy Commission as this problem!
Calling and how much does fostering engineers who doesn't should get together again!
But France has already know about it.
It is incumbent on Atomic Energy Commission to remind this thing as soon as liberal democratic things!
Please order early to remind you of the message. Please discuss in Parliament.
Thank you!
Thank you for http://ow.ly/kt8eK [Vice Chairman] valuable opinions.
And decommissioning schedule such as Atomic Energy Commission, according to human resource supply and demand predictions as soon as possible as to recommendations.
Regardless of the energy policy, has told human resources problem regime as an important.
[I] what France national research institutes warned why not in Japan?
More manpower is impossible!
Try at things that Japan nuclear academicism are bad now?
Europe is turning already that is's Acting Chairman Mr. should know the most.
Mr. S role is to propose this ignorant government! Move as soon as possible.
Please!
[Vice Chairman] to meet your expectations, so I'll try.
Though France national authority is safety research institutes. I hear in France also has a variety of opinions, to future national debate.
Will continue to look to the future debate. 
[I] are concerned France is to the safety of nuclear reactors.
Why such proposal doesn't come with research institutions from Japan do? 
    
Especially Tokyo Japan academism that are rude, ( ) awful!
"For the safety of nuclear power will reduce should" "France is too use nuclear power. ( using nuclear power nuclear power as impoverished and a decreased safety. ) hollande President aims to ensure the safety of nuclear power plants, nuclear energy use reduction is good judgment.
"France nuclear safety radiation protection Institute announced the official position.
Noted Director as well.
"Someday, reactor pressure vessel steel ( cover note: reactor vessel.
Circulate the coolant and shielding the leakage of radioactive material ) to crack date comes.
Then we "come on anymore this reactor a life ' and have to say. And it means that once the crack found in the pressure vessel, same thing all reactors were made around the same time, it is happening.
"Using nuclear power nuclear power plants are impoverished.
And safety is compromised.
In his view, in France should reduce reliance on nuclear power.
[Vice Chairman] pointed out problems being discussed in Japan, it is reported.
Pressure vessel embrittlement problem was pointed out from 3.11.
However, nuclear society without major discussions, as you pointed out, was safety regulatory system is not functioning.Transparency law established in France in 2006, shared information on nuclear safety was made more aggressively.
Transparency law advanced regional information committees and independent safety regulation legislation, etc. Learning transparency method in the Atomic Energy Commission in promoting information sharing on the safety in Japan "initiatives" ( views for public confidence., has suggested.
So said Prime Minister Shinzo Abe also reduce [Vice Chairman] http://www.aec.go.jp/jicst/NC/about/kettei/121225_1.pdf nuclear power dependence full clarity, would Japan also do similar in this part.
France is a national debate this thing to do. Goal is to nuclear power to around 50 percent.
Is where we were zero goal. once in the national debate are Japan, Abe, began arguing again.
[I] in any case, Japan academicism is off nuclear society led by!
Feel the anger caused this man-made disaster, no remorse and no apologies, the Constitution has not changed even now.
Now no change, Japan will be forever repeating a mistake.
To propose the right way is "academicism"!
Please change Japan!